Subject: Re: Subject: [Harp-L] HARMONICA PLAYING Arabian nights Belly dance
Vern writes:
"Please don't give any sweeping interpretations to my posts".
My response (Elizabeth's): Is that what you're assuming I did? Well pardon
me. I believe I merely quoted two small bits of your very own statements
back. Pray tell how that is in any way making 'sweeping interpretations'?
V: "My limited main point is that the Youtube video and audio performances
are not the same.
E: To which I've given a couple of reasonable explanations, which you won't
consider as possibilities without any real proof to the contrary, preferring
to label a harmonica player as a fraud with only supposition.
V: " I gave examples of why this is true. My posts had specifics that you
could have addressed if you can show that I am wrong."
E: There it is again. You say that your examples show 'why it is true' as if
it's already proven fact, when nothing at all about this man's playing has
been proven...yet. Your 'examples' ignore the most common-sense and logical
explanations. You aren't remotely considering that he just might have
pre-recorded his audio, then played over this already recorded music for the camera.
Why would you dismiss this strong possibility (given the reverb heard) out
of hand? Or the well-known reality that YouTube videos are notoriously out of
sync with the music, most especially with overseas videos? I'll point you
to a video of Christelle's ...she played Leonard Cohen's Hallelujah, whereupon
one 'sage' recently commented that it was a good try, but it wasn't her
playing because he'd caught something which didn't jibe with the music,
timing-wise. I can assure you (as I did him), her playing is legitimate and her
videos done almost exclusively in 'one-take'. (He still stubbornly believes he's
right)...so there is one specific example as a precedence for my belief about
Mr. Bhandari, among the many 'out-of-sync-with-the-music' videos I've seen.
V: "I did not condemn the whole man. I did point out his deception."
E: Calling him a fraud (in essence a liar about the music he is posting)
isn't condemning him? In what world? What deception are you pointing out? A
'deception' only you are assuming. I don't believe you or anyone else has the
right to assume such without first having absolute proof. Further, if your
statement that 'He is primarily known as a magician. Debunking the occult
powers of fraudulent magicians is important in India where these charlatans
prey on the ignorant." isn't 'condemning the man' by lumping him in with the
afore-mentioned charlatans, I don't know what is. Your use of the word
'these' clearly implicates him as one of 'them'.
V: "Since deception is his stock-in-trade as a magician, we may take a less
severe view than if someone like me had done it."
"I agree that the audio is great.....whoever played it. I suppose that it
is possible that he played the audio on another occasion. However, if he had
ever played it correctly, it is unlikely that he would have embellished the
video with so much phony button-pushing."
E: There's the same accusation again. Making it clear you assume he is not
the player of the music in question (as you did in your next follow-up post
to this).
V: "In the performance that you cite,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJafvhfycPM , did you notice that the music and the button action agreed and that
the dramatic button trills of the youtube performance were absent? "
E: Yes, Vern. Not every video goes out of sync. No one has claimed so.
The ones I'm talking about are those played directly into one's computer...not
something first videotaped and then put up on YouTube (as was the
performance in Russia).
As a matter of fact I DID notice that since his 9 years prior performance
his playing (and appearance) had changed quite a bit: he's gotten 9 years
older, his playing has gotten 9 years better, presumably ...and quite possibly
when he plays into his computer cam recently he felt the need to 'embellish' as
many others do..playing it up where he might not have for a Live audience.
I'd logically assume the quality of his playing had improved through 9 years
of additional practice and because he loves playing harmonica? (stated on his
site)
V: "The man has many admirable talents, including playing the harmonica
well. "Harp-synching" would seem to be below him."
E: What? You've just said he has added dramatic button trills and (in your
own words) 'phony button-pushing', yet now something as innocuous as
'harp-synching' (which isn't anything other than what those making music videos do),
is beneath him, to your mind?
V: "The "charlatans" that I referred to are the fraudulant magicians that
he debunks and that prey on ignorant or unsophisticated victims. They falsely
claim occult powers to help their victims for a steep price. see
http://www.hindu.com/2008/01/09/stories/2008010957900300.htm For this he deserves
great credit and praise. You must know that debunkers are my heroes! ;o)
Vern"
E: well, yes Vern. But you didn't KNOW he was a debunker until I posted
that information in response to your previous post in which you clearly were
lumping him in with those afore-mentioned magician/charlatans. In your own
words:
"He is a magician who may feel OK about fooling his audience."
"A remarkable performanc from one to whom music is apparently
only a sideline!"
"His website mentions music once but doesn't mention
harmonica. He is primarily known as a magician. Debunking
the occult powers of fraudulent magicians is important in
India where these charlatans prey on the ignorant."
E. Your words, Vern. Not mine. Not misquoted. If you insist that Mr.
Bhandari did not play the music he claims is his, then I suggest (since you believe
so strongly in 'debunking' charlatans) that you provide proof, not
suppositions about videos.
I also took the time to check out his website where he states quite
clearly":
"Hi I am a magician mouthorgan is my passion three things in life I love
friends magic & music...music...music "
umm..he might not have called it a 'harmonica' on his website Vern, which
lack of mention in your words you use to further bolster your claim, but I'd
have thought you'd already know that people in other countries (as we did in
Scotland where I grew up) call the instrument a mouth organ. A lot of the
world still does.
You might also have missed this following link in my first post where an old
college school mate of his talks about (and posts other links in admiration)
to his harmonica playing:
_http://tinyurl.com/deonq8_ (http://tinyurl.com/deonq8)
and from Mr. Bhandari's magicindia page:
_http://www.esnips.com/doc/3bad1979-ea20-4acf-9442-f845b37fe20f/sound-of-soul_
(http://www.esnips.com/doc/3bad1979-ea20-4acf-9442-f845b37fe20f/sound-of-soul)
_http://www.esnips.com/web/HarmonicaMouthorgan_
(http://www.esnips.com/web/HarmonicaMouthorgan)
I've now listened to a few of his tracks and found them quite enjoyable. If
these audio links he's posted to his own music are what's considered
'amateurish', then there's no hope for any chromatic player who strives to improve
his (or her) playing...especially over such a lengthy time period as 9 years. I
might as well quit now, since I've only come back to chromatic playing since
2004 ....so any improvements I thought I'd made in these few years would be
irrelevant if I were to use this kind of logic.
I have no dog in this fight...don't know Mr. Bhandari. I simply believe it's
extremely unfair to call any musician a fraud without actual and further
research and hard proof.
Elizabeth
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
steps!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1218822736x1201267884/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=fe
bemailfooterNO62)
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.